From: Philippe Verdy (verdy_p@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Fri Mar 10 2006 - 22:29:55 CST
From: "Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin" <antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt>
To: <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:38 AM
Subject: Re: Need help in interpreting symbol 225e (measured by)
> On 2006.03.09, 04:51, Gusztáv Jánvári <me@gusztav.janvari.name> wrote:
>
>> I’m in localizing Unicode symbol names to Hungarian, and I have to
>> translate the symbol name “measured by”:
>
> A bit off (this) topic: Why isn't U+225E decomposable as U+003D U+036B ?
Although it could look identical, I don't think that the m diacritic hasthe correct semantic. For me it's more like a normal "m" put above the equal sign. But Unicode does not allow such vertical layout for non-combining characters (except for the limited support of ruby notations *only below* normal text, encoded as with interlinear format controls, but mostly deprecated with XML-based notations like the HTML Ruby support for Asian texts, which also allows ruby notations *below and above* the main baseline)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 10 2006 - 22:31:31 CST