From: Richard Wordingham (richard.wordingham@ntlworld.com)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2006 - 12:47:49 CST
Brian Gould wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2006, at 9:38 PM, Curtis Clark wrote:
>
>> On 2006-04-12 18:05, Mark Davis wrote:
>>> *99,089*
>>> Too bad we were just 11 short of 100,000 for 5.0!
>>
>> Maybe it's a floating point error in my calc.exe, but I come up
>> with 911 short (which will be just about right to encode *all* the
>> Phaistos characters, when the rest of the corpus is discovered). :-)
>
> I think we could also come up with enough turtle ideograph and grass
> radical variants to fill the gap. :-)
How many variation sequences are there? How do I find the ideographic
variation database described in UTS #37 http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr37/
?
Richard.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 13 2006 - 13:00:25 CST