Re: UTF-8 can be used for more than it is given credit

From: Theodore H. Smith (delete@elfdata.com)
Date: Sun Jun 04 2006 - 17:02:52 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: are Unicode codes somehow specified in official national linguistic literature ? (worldwide)"

Previous message: Richard Wordingham: "Re: UTF-8 can be used for more than it is given credit"
In reply to: Richard Wordingham: "Re: UTF-8 can be used for more than it is given credit"
Next in thread: Richard Wordingham: "Re: UTF-8 can be used for more than it is given credit"
Reply: Richard Wordingham: "Re: UTF-8 can be used for more than it is given credit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Great answer Richard,

I think I should be able to understand Normalisation now.

Thanks for taking all the time you did in writing this out! Do you
have all the codepoints stored in your brain or did you look them up
just to give me the answers? Either way, thanks very much. My next
Unicode string processing code will be writing some NFD code.

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: are Unicode codes somehow specified in official national linguistic literature ? (worldwide)"
Previous message: Richard Wordingham: "Re: UTF-8 can be used for more than it is given credit"
In reply to: Richard Wordingham: "Re: UTF-8 can be used for more than it is given credit"
Next in thread: Richard Wordingham: "Re: UTF-8 can be used for more than it is given credit"
Reply: Richard Wordingham: "Re: UTF-8 can be used for more than it is given credit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 04 2006 - 17:08:53 CDT