From: James Kass (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2006 - 03:04:04 CDT
Doug Ewell replied to Theodore H. Smith,
> > 3) Each unique glyph, has one and only sequence of codepoints in NFD.
> I give up trying to explain why "glyph" is wrong in this context.
> Others are welcome to try. Good luck.
Please see John Hudson's post regarding terminology on another list to
understand why Doug Ewell calls "glyph" an inappropriate choice here,
specifically the end of the diacritic section:
Rather than (mis)using the term "glyph" in this context, it might be
better to call it a "grapheme/typeform" or even spell it out as "letter
or letter-with-mark combination".
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 06 2006 - 03:21:49 CDT