From: Karl Pentzlin (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Jun 13 2006 - 06:09:16 CDT
Am Dienstag, 13. Juni 2006 um 12:01 schrieb Michael Everson:
ME> At 10:53 +0200 2006-06-13, Karl Pentzlin wrote:
>>In that document, the hook(s) in fact appear to be not connected to
>>the base letter (see the attached enlarged "Zwei Haken.png"), thus
>>being different from the ogonek proper.
ME> Yes, I don't think it's an ogonek. Ogoneks always
ME> are attached to the base character.
I get convinced.
Especially after finding more examples, like
ME> To me, it looks like a subscripted
ME> dotless i, and doubled in the second instance.
It has that appearance, but as it is called "Haken" (hook) in German,
I think "COMBINING RIGHT-POINTING HOOK BELOW" resp. "COMBINING DOUBLE
..." would be the appropriate name.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 13 2006 - 06:36:44 CDT