From: Sinnathurai Srivas (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jul 11 2006 - 15:49:07 CDT
As far as Tamil is concerned it is wrong to have the dotted circle
introduced. We need to remove the dotted circle from Tamil encoding.
Also there are many fonts that donot come with a dotted circle included,
which causes havoc as it hides the tru natre of data (oppose to mistakingly
inserted dotted circles cause havoc in computing). Ever which way I think
dotted corcle is a problem than a solution for anythimg.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Ewell" <email@example.com>
To: "Unicode Mailing List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: dotted circle
> Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote:
>> At 13:57 +0100 2006-07-11, Jonathan Kew wrote:
>>> NBSP is not a solution here, because it will (should) result in the
>>> combining mark being displayed on a space, rather than combined with the
>>> preceding letter. That *might* be OK, depending exactly how the font is
>>> designed, for U+0BBE, for example, but not for U+0B82.
>> It sounds to me as though we need an INVISIBLE LETTER.
>> See http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n2822.pdf
> INVISIBLE LETTER would cause the combining mark to be displayed on a
> space, just like SPACE or NBSP, but without the processing pitfalls.
> Jonathan seems to be saying that is precisely *not* the desired rendering
> Doug Ewell
> Fullerton, California, USA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 11 2006 - 15:54:55 CDT