Re: Unicode 5.0 success

Date: Sun Sep 24 2006 - 01:48:44 CDT

  • Next message: Mark Davis: "Re: Unicode 5.0 success"

    My apologies.

    I made a mistake. At the beginning of the thread a comment was made suggesting
    some cjk charctes had been added. The IRG already has a list C1 of cjk
    characters that I expect will be added some time to unicode, I was wrong and
    thought maybe these had been added.

    John Knightley

    Quoting Richard Wordingham <>:

    > John Knightley wrote:
    > >> Where is there a list showing the unicode numbers for these added cjk
    > >> charcters,
    > >> and the charcters themselves. I am preparing a document at the momnet
    > >> which
    > >> requires this information, however I ahve only been able to find the
    > >> charcters
    > >> in the IRG files -- ie before code points were given
    > What makes you think any CJK characters were added? I've just looked
    > through the FPDAM2 amendment at
    > and I can see no additions
    > to the CJK blocks. I think Mike couldn't find any CJK additions from 4.1.0
    > to 5.0.0 because there weren't any.
    > Richard.

    This mail sent through Virus Free Email

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 24 2006 - 01:54:09 CDT