Re: CJK Extension C

From: Dominikus Scherkl (lyratelle@gmx.de)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2006 - 01:49:50 CST

Next message: Jon Hanna: "Re: Should names for sexes be included into CLDR?"

Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Should names for sexes be included into CLDR?"
In reply to: vunzndi@vfemail.net: "Re: CJK Extension C (was: Re: Unicode 5.0 success)"
Next in thread: James Kass: "Re: CJK Extension C"
Maybe reply: James Kass: "Re: CJK Extension C"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hello, I found the Extension C in the current roadmap, but the
link goes to the proposal for Myanmar ?!?
Strange enough, but also the link to the proposed "ancinet symbols"
leads to "phaistos disk".
I didn't checked if more links are broken, but it would be nice if
someone can care about this...

Best regards,

-- 
Dominikus Scherkl

Next message: Jon Hanna: "Re: Should names for sexes be included into CLDR?"
Previous message: Jukka K. Korpela: "Should names for sexes be included into CLDR?"
In reply to: vunzndi@vfemail.net: "Re: CJK Extension C (was: Re: Unicode 5.0 success)"
Next in thread: James Kass: "Re: CJK Extension C"
Maybe reply: James Kass: "Re: CJK Extension C"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 03 2006 - 01:54:01 CST