Re: Should names for sexes be included into CLDR?

From: Jukka K. Korpela (
Date: Tue Oct 03 2006 - 04:25:44 CST

  • Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Unicode & space in programming & l10n"

    On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Jon Hanna wrote:

    > There's another question about recording this, do we just use adjectives,
    > just nouns or adjectives, nouns and perhaps other terms (man, woman, boy,
    > girl as some English examples)?

    A good question, though perhaps best deferred to a later stage. Actually,
    after an eventual inclusion of the basic data, I would primarily worry
    about the forms used in conjunction with numerals. Information to be
    displayed may well be something that would be e.g. "42 men, 41 women" or
    "42 male, 41 female". The appropriate word might be an irregular plural,
    as "men", or it might be something completely different, like singular
    form in a particular form, and it may even depend on the value of the
    numeral modulo 10, as in Russian.

    So before opening such cans of worms, maybe the basic data should be
    defined. I think there are apparent candidates for the values in the
    default (root) locale for values 1 and 2, namely MALE SIGN and FEMALE
    SIGN, and 0 might reasonably be QUESTION MARK, and perhaps 9 is best
    rendered as EN DASH by default.

    Jukka "Yucca" Korpela,

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 03 2006 - 04:39:01 CST