From: Philippe Verdy (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Feb 16 2007 - 18:14:33 CST
> De : Markus Scherer [mailto:email@example.com]
> Envoyé : vendredi 16 février 2007 22:54
> À : firstname.lastname@example.org
> Cc : Mike; email@example.com
> Objet : Re: BOCU-1 spec
> On 2/16/07, Philippe Verdy <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > If this technical note (which has moved **back** from a "UTS draft" to a
> > simpler "technical note", without the yellow-background comments that
> > present two weeks ago, and that I had recently commented here in this
> > is to be published by Unicode,
> The current version of UTN #6 is simply the last version of it that
> was published before the proposed draft UTS #40. When the UTC decided
> to withdraw UTS #40, there was nothing automatic to move the text
> improvements to the UTN.
I did not say that. But even last week, the document that was accessible
from the Uniode Technical notes was the version of UTN#6 which was labelled
"Unicode Technical Standard (Draft)" and it was really UTS (not UTN)
although its numbering was wrong (UTS#6 refers to another document), but it
contained proposed changes.
Whan I wrote last week to the list, that's because the document looked like
if it was a proposed draft for discussions, and I had not noticed this
document was in the list of Public Reviews (as suggested by its form).
Because of that I have written here and to the online bug report form to
comment some of the proposed changes. But now those proposed changed have
disappeared without notice (it had also appeared with this form without
notice as well)!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 16 2007 - 18:17:02 CST