Re: BOCU-1 spec

From: Frank Ellermann (
Date: Sun Feb 18 2007 - 14:43:06 CST

  • Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: BOCU-1 spec"

    Doug Ewell wrote:
    >>> There was a decision made at a recent UTC meeting to withdraw PDUTS
    >>> #40 and keep BOCU-1 at the UTN level.

    >> Is that publicly documented somewhere, who voted, name, reason,
    >> timestamp, or similar ?
    > It's contained within the pre-preliminary minutes of UTC 110, which
    > are available only to members. It was a consensus decision.

    Thanks for info. I take it as "real standards have an RFC number" :-|

    >> Or as IETF RFC, after all it's already a registered IANA charset.
    > I think it would be interesting to see how IETF handled the IP issue.

    Known IPR have to be submitted, in theory a straight forward procedure,
    and for this case it should be also clear in practice, the authors know
    that IBM claims some IPR.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 18 2007 - 14:48:09 CST