From: Frank Ellermann (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Feb 18 2007 - 14:43:06 CST
Doug Ewell wrote:
>>> There was a decision made at a recent UTC meeting to withdraw PDUTS
>>> #40 and keep BOCU-1 at the UTN level.
>> Is that publicly documented somewhere, who voted, name, reason,
>> timestamp, or similar ?
> It's contained within the pre-preliminary minutes of UTC 110, which
> are available only to members. It was a consensus decision.
Thanks for info. I take it as "real standards have an RFC number" :-|
>> Or as IETF RFC, after all it's already a registered IANA charset.
> I think it would be interesting to see how IETF handled the IP issue.
Known IPR have to be submitted, in theory a straight forward procedure,
and for this case it should be also clear in practice, the authors know
that IBM claims some IPR.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 18 2007 - 14:48:09 CST