From: William J Poser (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 18:29:07 CST
The "accounting" number 100 has two variants, U+4F70 and U+964C,
which differ in that the former has the "human" radical (no. 9, U+4EBB)
whereas the latter has the mound radical (no. 170, U+961D).
There is a parallel pair for 1000, consisting of U+4EDF and U+9621.
However, although U+47F0, U+964C, and U+4EDF are listed in the unihan
database with the property kAccountingNumeric, there is no such entry
for U+9621. Am I correct in thinking that this is an omission?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 18:32:41 CST