Date: Mon Mar 26 2007 - 05:40:33 CST
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:21:25 +0100
"Andrew West" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 26/03/07, email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > As both fixes are not realistic, I wish if UTS #37 is updated
> > to have additional note to prohibit (not deprecate) the
> > codepoint conversion from CJK Compatibility Ideographs to
> > CJK Unified Ideographs with IVS. How do you think?
> I think that Unicode cannot prohibit anyone from applying any
> particular data transformation they like, including codepoint
> conversion from CJK Compatibility Ideographs to CJK Unified Ideographs
> with IVS.
Ah, sorry for my poor English. I think you're saying that
Unicode is NOT law that can permit or prohibit any software
by legal power. I agree. We have freedom to write a software
which does not conform to Unicode.
I wish if the conversion between CJK Compatibility Ideographs
and CJK Unified Ideograph plus IVS is commented as "IVS in
UTS #37 does not support the codepoint conversion (e.g. from
CJK Compatibility Ideographs to CJK Unified Ideographs plus IVS)".
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 05:37:58 CST