RE: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Sat May 05 2007 - 07:11:26 CST

Next message: Don Osborn: "Ranges/blocks ; font lookup by range"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
In reply to: Frank Ellermann: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Next in thread: Frank Ellermann: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Reply: Frank Ellermann: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Frank Ellermann

> ... SZlig is still no new character.

Shall we say that sz-lig is not a character? Clearly it's too late for that. The question before us is, given that sz-lig *is* encoded as a character, what is the best encoded representation for the typeform in question, "SZ-lig" (as you refer to it)?

Peter

Next message: Don Osborn: "Ranges/blocks ; font lookup by range"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
In reply to: Frank Ellermann: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Next in thread: Frank Ellermann: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Reply: Frank Ellermann: "Re: Uppercase ß is coming? (U+1E9E)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 05 2007 - 07:13:11 CST