From: Frank Ellermann (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun May 06 2007 - 12:02:56 CDT
Michael Everson wrote:
> Calling it SHARP S therefore is better than ESZETT in the
> context of the UCS.
Yes, there's a rule about never ever changing the name of a
code point, isn't it ? Otherwise "szlig" could be better,
not all "sharp s" are represented by "szlig" in German, let
alone elsewhere not limited to de-CH.
"German double s" is another name for this "eszet" beast,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun May 06 2007 - 12:06:53 CDT