Re: Uppercase is coming? (U+1E9E)

From: Petr Tomasek (tomasek@etf.cuni.cz)
Date: Mon May 07 2007 - 23:32:18 CDT

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: UTN #31 and direct compression of code points"

    >
    > I suspect, and indeed hope, that you are right. But this is why I consider
    > the proposed uppercase eszett a 'half-begotten' character. The proposal is
    > explicit that the standard orthographic casing for is SS, and the new
    > character is proposed on the understanding that it will not interfere with
    > existing implementations of that standard casing.

    It's pitty, that one cannot change the existing standard.
    Otherwise it would seem to me a clean solution to ha
    "lowecase" and "uppercase" and the font designed
    should decide, how the "uppercase " would be rendered:

    > John Hudson

    Petr Tomasek

    -- 
    Petr Tomasek <http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 07 2007 - 23:36:09 CDT