From: John H. Jenkins (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu May 31 2007 - 17:47:06 CDT
On May 31, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Shohji Itoh wrote:
> Give me some suggestions.
> Where is the difference ? * U+2FA1A
> * U+2A503
The main difference is that U+2FA1A is a compatibility ideograph and
shouldn't be used except for round-trip compatibility with CNS
11643-1992. That is, unless you're converting text from CNS
11643-1992 to Unicode, you should not use this character.
John H. Jenkins
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 31 2007 - 17:48:41 CDT