Re: Devanagari composing help needed

From: John Hudson ([email protected])
Date: Thu Jun 07 2007 - 13:58:55 CDT

  • Next message: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven: "Re: Devanagari composing help needed"

    Eric Muller wrote:

    > I think that what Ambarish is telling is us is that what Unicode has
    > described as RA_sub (see rule R6 in section 9.1), aka vattu in OpenType,
    > should really considered as made of two parts, one stroke for RA and one
    > stroke for a halant.

    > In everything I have seen from Unicode and OpenType, vattu is viewed as
    > an atomic object, and is graphically depicted as two connected strokes.
    > Is it common to display a vattu as two disconnected strokes?

    No, it is not common, although arguably the floating ^ rakar (vattu) might have originally
    derived from a combination of a low-left-to-high-right 'RA_sub' stroke and
    high-left-to-low-right halant stroke. Even in manuscript, though, there would have been
    little impetus to write them separately: why lift the pen when you don't need to?

    It looks to me like what the font in Jeroen's screenshot is doing is representing the
    'RA_sub' in a way that will create merged rakar forms on-the-fly. When 'RA_sub' merges
    with a letter, it is represented by a single stroke like this. These are most commonly
    represented by precomposed glyphs, but it is possible to build them using a stroke like
    this, although I think this is a bad idea for a number of reasons. In this case, the
    problem is that 'RA-sub" does not merge with all letters, and does not merge with
    round-bottomed letters like ट. So I consider this diagonal stroke cutting through the
    bottom of ट to be an incorrect representation of rakar in this context. It looks to me
    like this font simply implements the rakar, by default, as a single stroke, which can be
    positioned to create on-th-fly merged rakar forms with most letters but which looks
    incorrect with certain letters.

    John Hudson

    -- 
    Tiro Typeworks        www.tiro.com
    Gulf Islands, BC      [email protected]
    We say our understanding measures how things are,
    and likewise our perception, since that is how we
    find our way around, but in fact these do not measure.
    They are measured.   -- Aristotle, Metaphysics
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 07 2007 - 14:00:41 CDT