From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Sun Jun 24 2007 - 15:58:15 CDT
On 6/24/2007 7:56 AM, Michael Maxwell wrote:
> George W Gerrity wrote:
> > The point is that there is ... absolutely no future for
> (*human-readable*) representations
> > in bases larger than 16 ...
>
This does not mean that there's no use for continuing support of
historical representations of such numbers, so clearly it was not meant
as an argument against encoding Mayan numerals.
>
> Someone on this list will doubtless correct me, but I don't believe
> the Mayan script, either the numbers or the pictograms, has been
> encoded in Unicode.
It's not yet encoded. You can check the roadmaps or the proposed scripts
pages on the unicode web site for further information. The roadmap is a
non-binding, tentative summary of possible locations and magnitude of
outstanding scripts (as well as a summary of already encoded and pending
scripts), with links to proposal documents for existing proposals.
A./
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 24 2007 - 16:03:54 CDT