From: John Hudson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jul 12 2007 - 16:22:52 CDT
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> Can we agree on the terminology to adopt when referring to these characters?
> "generic base" or "generic base symbols" (as they are not intended to be
> letters but used as a distinct notation to be replaced by actual letters).
I would call them simply generic bases, because while they might be said to stand in for
letters, their primary function is to provide a base for the combining marks. When I
employ such a character, I don't think of it as a stand-in symbol for a letter, but as a
conventional base for a combining mark or marks.
-- Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com Gulf Islands, BC email@example.com We say our understanding measures how things are, and likewise our perception, since that is how we find our way around, but in fact these do not measure. They are measured. -- Aristotle, Metaphysics
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 12 2007 - 16:25:56 CDT