From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Aug 24 2007 - 01:13:35 CDT
Eric Muller <emuller at adobe dot com> wrote:
> ... Most of the time, it should be U+2010 ‐ HYPHEN. However, the
> support in fonts for U+2010 is less than perfect, and some users they
> will get a .notdef glyph.
Speaking only for myself, the poor level of support for U+2010 in many
mainstream fonts with otherwise decent Unicode coverage is a frequent
annoyance, and a puzzlement.
-- Doug Ewell * Fullerton, California, USA * RFC 4645 * UTN #14 http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 24 2007 - 01:17:39 CDT