RE: Where is the First> Last> convention documented?

From: Kenneth Whistler (
Date: Thu Sep 13 2007 - 16:54:48 CDT

  • Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "RE: Where is the First> Last> convention documented?"

    > > Some were, and some were not. The IBM EBCDIC control functions
    > > differ significantly from the ISO 6429 C0 and C1 controls.
    > > See, for example:
    > >
    > >
    > I don't take this as a reference for EBCDIC. The mappings betweenEBCDIC and
    > ISO 8859-1 were published since long by IBM and prevail. I have never seen
    > the differences you expose here (possibly a fantasy from the author of this
    > site, due to some specific use in some old IBM-specific application, and
    > assumption that the use in such application was changing the mapping.)

    O.k., smartypants. Would you take *this* as more definitive?


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 13 2007 - 16:56:38 CDT