From: Kenneth Whistler (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2007 - 16:54:48 CDT
> > Some were, and some were not. The IBM EBCDIC control functions
> > differ significantly from the ISO 6429 C0 and C1 controls.
> > See, for example:
> > http://www.barrcentral.com/help/spool/B_ASCII_and_EBCDIC_Standards.htm
> I don't take this as a reference for EBCDIC. The mappings betweenEBCDIC and
> ISO 8859-1 were published since long by IBM and prevail. I have never seen
> the differences you expose here (possibly a fantasy from the author of this
> site, due to some specific use in some old IBM-specific application, and
> assumption that the use in such application was changing the mapping.)
O.k., smartypants. Would you take *this* as more definitive?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 13 2007 - 16:56:38 CDT