RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Sat Sep 29 2007 - 10:43:56 CDT

Next message: Sarasvati: "Re: Fish, and off-topic"

Previous message: [email protected]: "RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)"
In reply to: [email protected]: "RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)"
Next in thread: Jim Melton: "RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)"
Reply: Jim Melton: "RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 10:39 -0500 2007-09-29, [email protected] wrote:

>Why the "theo logical" as opposed to the "theo alogical".
>
>John

I strongly suspect that Her Divine Effulgence will shortly put an end
to this thread.

-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Sarasvati: "Re: Fish, and off-topic"
Previous message: [email protected]: "RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)"
In reply to: [email protected]: "RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)"
Next in thread: Jim Melton: "RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)"
Reply: Jim Melton: "RE: Fish (was Re: Marks)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 29 2007 - 10:49:19 CDT