From: Hans Aberg (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Oct 13 2007 - 14:56:35 CDT
On 13 Oct 2007, at 21:36, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>> That operation is not very useful, because the language complement of
>> say a single character c is the set of all other strings. So if one
>> is finding the longest string in the language from a point on, and
>> the string isn't c, all will be eaten.
> No, such operation is typically used in association with a "&&"
> that restricts the set of matchable strings. They are used also for
> left and right contexts without including these contexts in the
> But as you said, "all will be eaten" ONLY IF "the string is not c",
> so the
> effect of negation is NOT producing the whole set of possible texts.
The problem is that any string starting with c will also be in the
language complement and matched. This is not what you want: my guess
is that you only want the strings of length 1 in this case. And
similar, for a string s of length k, you what the complement to be
all strings of length k not equal to s. Right? This is not the
language complement, but the (graded) complement in the subset of all
strings of length k.
So the language complement is not what you want.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Oct 13 2007 - 14:57:36 CDT