Re: The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2008 - 07:04:17 CST

Next message: Otto Stolz: "Re: The Geejay"

Previous message: Andreas Stötzner: "The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
In reply to: Andreas Stötzner: "The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
Next in thread: Otto Stolz: "Re: The Geejay"
Reply: Otto Stolz: "Re: The Geejay"
Reply: John Hudson: "Re: The Geejay"
Reply: Andreas Stötzner: "Re: The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 13:12 +0100 2008-01-03, Andreas Stötzner wrote:

>I complied a little consideration upon it, see
>http://www.signographie.de/cms/front_content.php?idart=232&changelang=2
>
>- Will be funny business for our case pairing enthusiasts :-)

On foot of the shape of the letter I would
consider encoding it as the capital form of
U+0261, as LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G.

-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Otto Stolz: "Re: The Geejay"
Previous message: Andreas Stötzner: "The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
In reply to: Andreas Stötzner: "The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
Next in thread: Otto Stolz: "Re: The Geejay"
Reply: Otto Stolz: "Re: The Geejay"
Reply: John Hudson: "Re: The Geejay"
Reply: Andreas Stötzner: "Re: The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 03 2008 - 07:09:04 CST