Re: The Geejay

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2008 - 08:43:04 CST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"

Previous message: Andreas Stötzner: "Re: The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
In reply to: John Hudson: "Re: The Geejay"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: The Geejay"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: The Geejay"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 06:25 -0800 2008-01-03, John Hudson wrote:
>>On foot of the shape of the letter I would consider encoding it as
>>the capital form of U+0261, as LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SCRIPT G.
>
>Surely not considering the presence of the dot.

I don't think the dot is significant or contrastive.

-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
Previous message: Andreas Stötzner: "Re: The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
In reply to: John Hudson: "Re: The Geejay"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: The Geejay"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: The Geejay"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 03 2008 - 08:44:39 CST