Re: The Geejay

From: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin (antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt)
Date: Fri Jan 04 2008 - 07:13:22 CST

Next message: Andreas Stötzner: "Re: The Geejay"

Previous message: arno: "Re: chairless hamza"
In reply to: Andreas Stötzner: "The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

While everybody is discussing a putative encoding, what do you think it
should be used to represent this character while/if it is not encoded,
should the need arise? I can imagine the following two hacks:

g<ZWJ>j or G<ZWJ>j

U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G U+0358 COMBINING DOT ABOVE RIGHT

The former being more semantic, the latter more glyphic. Comments?

-- 
António MARTINS-Tuválkin                                            ____.
<antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt>                                          |  ()|
                                         Não me invejo de quem tem |####|
PT-1500-111 LISBOA                       carros, parelhas e montes      |
+351 934 821 700, +351 217 150 939       só me invejo de quem bebe      |
ICQ:193279138  http://tuvalkin.web.pt/   a água em todas as fontes      |

Next message: Andreas Stötzner: "Re: The Geejay"
Previous message: arno: "Re: chairless hamza"
In reply to: Andreas Stötzner: "The Geejay (was: Acceptable alembic glyph variants)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 04 2008 - 07:26:04 CST