[Fwd: Re: Acceptable alembic glyph variants]

From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Fri Jan 04 2008 - 21:20:26 CST

Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: The Geejay"

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: chairless hamza"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "RE: [Fwd: Re: Acceptable alembic glyph variants]"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "RE: [Fwd: Re: Acceptable alembic glyph variants]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> There may exist in fact lots of unstudied ligatures in medieval scripts,

The discussion so far has been about phonetic symbols. Start a new thread.

Sorry, didn't see that you had reached back to the original thread on the alembic.
But that has morphed already once, so it's really time to start a new thread...

A./

Next message: Curtis Clark: "Re: The Geejay"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: chairless hamza"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "RE: [Fwd: Re: Acceptable alembic glyph variants]"
Reply: Philippe Verdy: "RE: [Fwd: Re: Acceptable alembic glyph variants]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 04 2008 - 21:22:34 CST