From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2008 - 07:40:23 CST
At 13:20 +0100 2008-01-07, Andreas Stötzner wrote:
>MUFI's preference for precomposed characters is
>simply due to practical life: with precomp.
>glyphs in suitable fonts you are on the safe
>side, with decomposed ones not.
You are right that a font should have
pre-composed glyphs. But you're not right to
think that it is necessary to use PUA encoding to
access them. That's the big problem with MUFI as
I see it: it uses PUA code points for
pre-composed "characters" instead of using the
right font tables within the fonts to access them.
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 07 2008 - 07:43:20 CST