Re: FPDAM5: Egyptian hieroglyphs (was Re: Marks)

From: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin (antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt)
Date: Fri Jan 11 2008 - 20:06:53 CST

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Regarding binary combining accents and grouping characters"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Unicode Format for Network Interchange"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: FPDAM5: Egyptian hieroglyphs (was Re: Marks)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 2008.01.09, 23:58, Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> quoted and
asked:

>> I liked the glyphs in the previous proposal much better.
>
> Be specific about what proposals you are talking about.

I thibk that the glyphs look much purtier in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 N1944
(of 1999.01.09) than in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 L2/05-311 (of 2005.10.24).
Is there a story behind this change?

-- 
António MARTINS-Tuválkin                                            ____.
<antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt>                                          |  ()|
                                         Não me invejo de quem tem |####|
PT-1500-111 LISBOA                       carros, parelhas e montes      |
+351 934 821 700, +351 217 150 939       só me invejo de quem bebe      |
ICQ:193279138  http://tuvalkin.web.pt/   a água em todas as fontes      |

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "RE: Regarding binary combining accents and grouping characters"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Unicode Format for Network Interchange"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "Re: FPDAM5: Egyptian hieroglyphs (was Re: Marks)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 11 2008 - 21:53:27 CST