Re: How diacritics below a modifier letter should behave?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2008 - 18:50:42 CST

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: i with macron over an e - Do U+0365 and U+2071 lose their dot when accented like U+0069?"

Previous message: Karl Pentzlin: "How diacritics below a modifier letter should behave?"
In reply to: Karl Pentzlin: "How diacritics below a modifier letter should behave?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 01:27 +0100 2008-02-23, Karl Pentzlin wrote:
>If a nonspacing mark (diacritic) below a modified letter (with raised
>appearance) is applied, can it be expected to be applied to the
>bottom of the modifier letter (instead of below the baseline), as long
>as the font or rendering is "smart" enough to place nonspacing marks
>according to Unicode rules?

I should think so.

-- 
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: i with macron over an e - Do U+0365 and U+2071 lose their dot when accented like U+0069?"
Previous message: Karl Pentzlin: "How diacritics below a modifier letter should behave?"
In reply to: Karl Pentzlin: "How diacritics below a modifier letter should behave?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 22 2008 - 18:53:08 CST