From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Sun Feb 24 2008 - 15:22:37 CST
On 2/24/2008 12:14 PM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> おはようございます中川さん、
>
> -On [20080224 19:34], Satoshi Nakagawa (snakagawa@infoteria.co.jp) wrote:
>
>> IMHO, (U+3001) and (U+3002) should not be treated as CL. Because we cannot
>> apply LB30 to them. They should be separated as a different class.
>>
>
> I would have to agree with the evidence as you present it. I will double
> check it tomorrow myself as well.
>
>
This is a known problem, and, I believe, it is being addressed for 5.1.
A./
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 24 2008 - 15:25:30 CST