From: Asmus Freytag (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Feb 24 2008 - 15:22:37 CST
On 2/24/2008 12:14 PM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20080224 19:34], Satoshi Nakagawa (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
>> IMHO, (U+3001) and (U+3002) should not be treated as CL. Because we cannot
>> apply LB30 to them. They should be separated as a different class.
> I would have to agree with the evidence as you present it. I will double
> check it tomorrow myself as well.
This is a known problem, and, I believe, it is being addressed for 5.1.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 24 2008 - 15:25:30 CST