From: Andreas Prilop (email@example.com)
Date: Mon May 05 2008 - 10:30:37 CDT
I refer to
In ISO-8859-1, code position 0x90 is mapped to U+0090.
In Windows-1252, code position 0x90 is listed as "undefined".
Why are they treated differently?
International Standard ISO/IEC 8859-1 does *not* define
code position 0x90. So it might also be listed as "undefined".
Or, for purely practical reasons, 0x90 in Windows-1252 might
also be mapped to U+0090.
This different behaviour for undefined code positions may
occasionally cause trouble - please see
Thread "Fallback to UTF-8".
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 05 2008 - 10:34:32 CDT