From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue May 06 2008 - 16:19:45 CDT
At 17:12 -0400 2008-05-06, William J Poser wrote:
> >That does not matter. The point is to identify the letters
> >unambiguously, and these are members of a class of letters which are
> >identified by the string CARRIER in their name. That is, there is a
> >class of CARRIER G-, CARRIER J-, and CARRIER L- letters to which
> >these belong even if not used in the Carrier language.
>Is there a policy to use such names? I was not aware of this idea of
>defining classes using language names unrelated to the use of the
>characters in the names. This has the potential to be quite misleading.
The UCAS block is composed of runs of classes.
-- Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 06 2008 - 16:22:01 CDT