From: Hans Aberg (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Nov 25 2008 - 02:44:39 CST
On 25 Nov 2008, at 06:17, Erkki I. Kolehmainen wrote:
>> If one puts diacritical marks on top of "ij", then the dots should be
> In most cases, yes. The Lithuanian accented letters, however, are an
> exception. That is the reason why some of them have had to be
> constructed as
> named sequences.
The snipped context refers to math...
But if there would ever be a successor to the current Unicode set, it
might be best to represent characters in atomic components that are
combined: a sufficiently advanced program can recognize and typeset
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 25 2008 - 02:46:42 CST