RE: wrong ccc for 0602?

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Sun Nov 30 2008 - 23:10:42 CST

  • Next message: tex: "HKSCS supplementary examples"

    From: [] On Behalf Of John Hudson

    > Hmm. This is a tricky matter, Arno, because the Arabic
    > footnote sign is an enclosing mark...

    Correction -- at least regarding U+0602: its general category is Cf (other format); it is not a combining mark. Only combining marks (general category = Mc, Me or Mn) have a non-zero value for ccc.

    (That comment has no bearing on the question John was discussing, viz. whether a separate high footnote sign should be encoded.)


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 30 2008 - 23:15:29 CST