From: Peter Constable (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Nov 30 2008 - 23:10:42 CST
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of John Hudson
> Hmm. This is a tricky matter, Arno, because the Arabic
> footnote sign is an enclosing mark...
Correction -- at least regarding U+0602: its general category is Cf (other format); it is not a combining mark. Only combining marks (general category = Mc, Me or Mn) have a non-zero value for ccc.
(That comment has no bearing on the question John was discussing, viz. whether a separate high footnote sign should be encoded.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 30 2008 - 23:15:29 CST