From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Dec 25 2008 - 04:21:57 CST
On 25 Dec 2008, at 09:50, Ruszlan Gaszanov wrote:
> Personally, I see no problem with encoding a few more common
> emoticons - after all we already have U+2639, U+263A and U+263B. It
> is the value of encoding things like images of animals and
> vegetables or animated versions of existing punctuation I find
> highly questionable.
Lots of the animals are encoded as Egyptian hieroglyphs already.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 02 2009 - 15:33:07 CST