RE: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Mon Jan 12 2009 - 11:53:24 CST

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy"

    That's for JPGs and GIFs in html, not emoji encoded as characters.


    -----Original Message-----
    From: [] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
    Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:58 AM
    To: unicode Unicode Discussion
    Subject: Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy

    On 12 Jan 2009, at 05:43, Peter Constable wrote:

    > Well, if this is indicative...
    > it would seem to be the case that they *won't need* to encode more
    > emoji in that eventuality -- at least for this vendor: note the use
    > of HTML rather than plain text and the use of Flash or of JPG and
    > GIF for pictograms.

    But this
      seems to tell people what size to use if they want to make their own.

    Michael Everson *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 12 2009 - 11:55:15 CST