From: Peter Constable (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Jan 12 2009 - 11:53:24 CST
That's for JPGs and GIFs in html, not emoji encoded as characters.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:58 AM
To: unicode Unicode Discussion
Subject: Re: Emoji: emoticons vs. literacy
On 12 Jan 2009, at 05:43, Peter Constable wrote:
> Well, if this is indicative...
> it would seem to be the case that they *won't need* to encode more
> emoji in that eventuality -- at least for this vendor: note the use
> of HTML rather than plain text and the use of Flash or of JPG and
> GIF for pictograms.
But this http://www.nttdocomo.co.jp/english/service/imode/make/content/deco_mail/pictograph/index.html
seems to tell people what size to use if they want to make their own.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 12 2009 - 11:55:15 CST