From: John Hudson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jan 21 2009 - 15:56:24 CST
Leo Broukhis wrote:
> Oops. Take that back, my hissing should be directed at Microsoft. It's
> not Code2000, it's Times New Roman.
I've checked the cmap table of Vista Times New Roman, and there is no
mapping for U+1E9E. However, the font does not appear to contain a
.notdef glyph, which is the normal display when a font does not support
a character in the text string. It has an empty box glyph in the GID 0
position of the font, which is where the .notdef glyph belongs, but this
glyph is encoded as U+0000 and is called /uni0000/ in the post table, so
will not be reliably treated as .notdef. I'm not sure why the
application or browser is choosing to display the unsupported character
as S with cedilla. It seems a pretty random choice.
-- Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com Gulf Islands, BC email@example.com The Lord entered her to become a servant. The Word entered her to keep silence in her womb. The thunder entered her to be quiet. -- St Ephrem the Syrian
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 21 2009 - 15:59:36 CST