From: Shawn Steele (???) (Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Mar 18 2009 - 11:00:05 CST
(speaking as myself)
Sounds like a Firefox bug. Unassigned code points should cause an error since they aren’t assigned. If they were dropped, then at the least, the shortened name should show up in the address bar.
For most users this probably doesn’t matter much since you can easily contrive URLs that look real at a quick glance or to someone not familiar with URLs, eg: https://www.google.com.secure.net would fool many users.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of Chris Weber
Sent: Pōʻ, Malaki 17, 2009 10:06 PM
Subject: Attack vectors through Unassigned Code Points in IDN
In I’m reading RFC 3491 correctly, then IDNA allows for unassigned code points to exist in strings and domain names. This makes spoofing attacks possible when one these code points don’t have associated glyphs and basically show up as white space. This seems to be the case with some ranges like U+115A..U+115E under. In this case the following URL provides an attack vector in Firefox, because the domain nottrusted.org gets pushed way out of view in the Address Bar.
My question is – was this the intended behavior of IDNA to allow unassigned code points in IDN? Or is this more related to a font rendering issue?
7. Unassigned Code Points in Internationalized Domain Names
If the processing in [IDNA] specifies that a list of unassigned code
points be used, the system uses table A.1 from [STRINGPREP] as its
list of unassigned code points.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 18 2009 - 11:02:35 CST