From: Petr Tomasek (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Apr 11 2009 - 05:20:01 CDT
What is the policy about encoding super- (and sub-) scripts in unicode?
In hebrew grammars the superscipt "a", "e", "o" and "ə" are used
for trascription of the Ḥāteffs and Šwa signs (U+05b0..U+05b3).
The nearest characters I found are U+1d43, U+1d49, U+1d52 and U+1d4a,
they fit quite well visually, but they are "MODIFIER LETTER".
So, shouldn't more superscripts be defined in unicode?
-- Petr Tomasek <http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek> Jabber: firstname.lastname@example.org SIP: email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 11 2009 - 05:22:33 CDT