Re: So much for accuracy!

From: Ed Trager (
Date: Tue May 12 2009 - 13:16:51 CDT

  • Next message: Behnam: "Re: So much for accuracy!"

    Hi, Bheanm,

    On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Behnam <> wrote:
    > This is interesting!
    > Arabic script knew something when it opted for reading the entire word
    > instead of individual characters!
    > Behnam
    >> fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too
    >> Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55plepoe out of 100 can.

    I wloud rlleay lkie to see the suocre of tihs staitistc ... I sohwed
    tihs to my ocffie ceagueolls and we tinhk it sluhod be cselor to 100
    pcenert ( aomng pelope who konw Eglinsh ) ...

    - Ed

    >> i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The
    >> phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde
    >> Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the
    >> olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit
    >> pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a
    >> pboerlm Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef,
    >> but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
    >> ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs forwrad it.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 12 2009 - 13:18:33 CDT