Re: So much for accuracy!

• Previous message: Behnam: "So much for accuracy!"
• In reply to: Behnam: "So much for accuracy!"
• Next in thread: Behnam: "Re: So much for accuracy!"
• Reply: Behnam: "Re: So much for accuracy!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi, Bheanm,

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Behnam <behnam.rassi@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is interesting!
> Arabic script knew something when it opted for reading the entire word
> instead of individual characters!
> Behnam
>
>> fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too
>>
>> Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55plepoe out of 100 can.

I wloud rlleay lkie to see the suocre of tihs staitistc ... I sohwed
tihs to my ocffie ceagueolls and we tinhk it sluhod be cselor to 100
pcenert ( aomng pelope who konw Eglinsh ) ...

- Ed

>>
>> i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The
>> phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde
>> Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the
>> olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit
>> pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a
>> pboerlm Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef,
>> but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was
>> ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs forwrad it.
>
>
>

• Next message: Behnam: "Re: So much for accuracy!"
• Previous message: Behnam: "So much for accuracy!"
• In reply to: Behnam: "So much for accuracy!"
• Next in thread: Behnam: "Re: So much for accuracy!"
• Reply: Behnam: "Re: So much for accuracy!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 12 2009 - 13:18:33 CDT