Re: Invalid code points

From: Doug Ewell (doug@ewellic.org)
Date: Sun May 31 2009 - 12:42:15 CDT

  • Next message: Hans Aberg: "Re: Invalid code points"

    Hans Aberg <haberg at math dot su dot se> wrote:

    > In particular, it would be great to know if the range U+0080, ,
    > U+009F is invalid.

    That bit is especially wrong. I can at least imagine why there might be
    confusion about the noncharacters and surrogate code points, but not the
    C1 controls.

    --
    Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
    http://www.ewellic.org
    http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
    http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun May 31 2009 - 12:44:52 CDT