From: Mark Davis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jun 23 2009 - 15:49:09 CDT
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:52, Leo Broukhis <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've tried commenting on the Unicode 5.2 beta using the online form
> but it seems to be a bit bucket.
The online form is used to collect information for the UTC meeting in
August; no responses will be forthcoming until after that meeting. If you
want to have discussion of particular issues, you can copy your response to
this list (as you seem to be doing here).
> I've noticed two issues:
> 1. The index has not been rebuilt and misses new characters:
> Index-5.2.0d1.txt 16-Sep-2008 14:53 145K
> 2. (Beating my own drum here)
> shouldn't U+23E8 be Grapheme_Base # Sm instead of So (as per the proposal)?
It is most useful for discussion if people *do not* simply cite the code
point; best is to at least include the name, if not the literal character
(where already assigned).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 23 2009 - 15:51:29 CDT