From: Asmus Freytag (asmusf@ix.netcom.com)
Date: Wed Sep 09 2009 - 13:25:12 CDT
On 9/9/2009 8:19 AM, Harshula wrote:
>
>> better to state explicitly that fonts compliant to Level 1
>> *or above* are recognized, if that's what you mean, even though Levels 2
>> and 3 are defined elsewhere as supersets of lower levels. I think
>> Roozbeh may have mentioned this already.
>>
>
> No, he did not. Thanks, I will incorporate that change. The other option
> is to change the "shall" to a "should". i.e. change it to a
> recommendation. Do you have any preference/comments on that?
>
I think you should be able to answer that in the affirmative given the
tenor of the discussion so far!
A./
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 09 2009 - 13:28:50 CDT