From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Oct 20 2009 - 07:31:15 CDT
"William_J_G Overington" <wjgo underscore 10009 at btinternet dot com>
>> ... , implying that the Rubicon has already been
> Surely the crossing of the Rubicon means going irrevocably against
> established authority, yet in the emoji situation there is no
> established authority to have gone against as the emoji are not
> encoded in regular Unicode at this time.
I chose that metaphor merely to denote a point at which there is no
turning back. No reference to established authority was intended. I
probably could have chosen a better one if I had thought harder.
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 20 2009 - 08:12:20 CDT