From: André Szabolcs Szelp (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Dec 10 2009 - 12:20:10 CST
I doubt you can demonstrate that this is not just a glyph variant (and one
obviously in mistake even!) of the regular N.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Christopher Key <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Is  sufficient example of usage of a character to merit its inclusion
> in Unicode?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Dec 10 2009 - 12:22:54 CST