From: vanisaac@boil.afraid.org
Date: Wed Feb 03 2010 - 13:40:28 CST
From: spir (denis.spir@free.fr)
Date: Wed Feb 03 2010 - 05:19:45 CST
> What I meant is: is it legal to encode a "user-perceived character" in really
> great disorder, eg with a combining mark following what obviously is the base
> character. In the example, having the <dot above> come first. I interpret
> your answers meaning no, it's illegal.
You are correct. If you consider cannonical reordering in the form of a bubble
sort, a ccc=0 would indicate that a character cannot trade with another. Given
that a combining sequence is in the form of a base character, followed by
combining characters, it means that you cannot legally reorder a combining
character followed by the base character into a proper combining sequence by
alogorithm.
-Van
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 03 2010 - 13:46:10 CST