From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Feb 15 2010 - 07:49:32 CST
Asmus Freytag <asmusf at ix dot netcom dot com> wrote:
> On the contrary, Unicode has, on occasion, deliberately encoded
> characters for which there was credible evidence of planned widespread
> future use.
Which ones, besides EURO SIGN?
-- Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 15 2010 - 07:53:26 CST