Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?

From: Kent Karlsson (kent.karlsson14@comhem.se)
Date: Thu Feb 18 2010 - 08:34:28 CST

Next message: Jon Hanna: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"

Previous message: Kent Karlsson: "Re: character "combinability""
In reply to: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Next in thread: Jon Hanna: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Den 2010-02-18 14.33, skrev "Werner LEMBERG" <wl@gnu.org>:

>
>> For example, I was really surprised to learn that the uppercase form
>> of ? (epsilontonos) is ? (Epsioontonos) which is clearly incorrect.
>
> For uppercase -> lowercase conversion this is not a bad thing. It's
> the job of the font designer to create a glyph form for Epsilontonos
> which doesn't display the tonos.

That would be an exceptionally bad idea, needlessly masquerading a letter
as another letter.

/kent k

> Werner
>
>

Next message: Jon Hanna: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Previous message: Kent Karlsson: "Re: character "combinability""
In reply to: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Next in thread: Jon Hanna: "Re: Greek chars encoded twice -- why?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 18 2010 - 08:35:47 CST